top of page

Pre-Investment Capital Risk Quantification™

Updated: 19 hours ago

A 5-Day Capital Protection Assessment Before Funding Commitment


Organisations scrutinize vendor pricing, delivery timelines, and technical architecture before approving large transformation budgets. Very few verify whether enterprise anatomy is stable before capital is released.


When a $20M–$150M transformation is approved without anatomy verification, the organisation does not immediately lose capital. It risks funding reconstruction instead of execution.


When connective reasoning across:

P1 Strategy →P2 Sequencing →P3 Rule Authority →P4 Component Constraints →P5 Implementation →P6 Operations

is not explicitly externalised before investment, implementation begins before invariance is defined.


That is capital exposure.

Pre-Investment Capital Risk Quantification™ measures whether anatomy continuity exists before capital is committed.


Why Pre-Investment Risk Is Increasing

Capital approval cycles are accelerating.

• Board-driven digital mandates

• Platform replacement urgency

• Multi-vendor proposals

• Regulatory modernization pressure

• Competitive time-to-market compression


In many cases, funding precedes anatomy inspection.


When implementation begins before anatomical clarity is verified, inflation becomes embedded inside execution.


What Breaks — And Why It Matters Financially

When P1–P4 intent is not verified before funding:

The program does not collapse. It becomes:

• 15–30% more expensive during execution

• More coordination-heavy across vendors

• More prone to sequencing redesign

• More likely to reconstruct rule ownership mid-stream


These are not vendor inefficiencies. They are reconstruction costs.

Capital expansion rarely begins with failure. It begins with funding ambiguity.


Real Scenario Snapshot

A €72M ERP modernisation program in Germany. Board approval secured.

  1. Implementation commenced. Within 6 months:

  2. Impact analysis time increased from 5 days to 18 days.

  3. Change requests touched 7 subsystems instead of 3.

  4. Budget variance reached 14%.


Pre-Investment Capital Risk Quantification™ later identified:

12 decision authorities not anatomically mapped (P1)

9 sequencing invariants undocumented (P2)

Fragmented rule logic across finance and reporting modules (P3)

Component constraints embedded in vendor configurations (P4→P5)


The program was not poorly executed. It was funded before anatomical verification.


What Is Pre-Investment Anatomical Readiness?

It is the ability to demonstrate anatomy invariance across P1–P6 before capital deployment. If continuity cannot be demonstrated prior to funding, capital exposure is already active.


The assessment is grounded in ICMG Enterprise Anatomy™, mapping enterprise across 15 functional departments (D1–D15), refined through six invariant perspectives (P1–P6).


How Anatomical Gaps Translate to Capital Inflation

Unmapped P1 → Governance ambiguity during change

Weak P2 → Sequence redesign during execution

Drift in P3 → Rule conflicts across vendors

Undefined P4 → Boundary reconfiguration mid-program


Capital × Anatomy Drift = Inflation Risk

Anatomical cause → financial consequence.


The Service Package: 5-Day Pre-Investment Scan

Trigger: Board approval pending or RFP issued.

Objective: Verify anatomy continuity before irreversible capital commitment.


What We Quantify

P1 – Strategy CohesionAre decision rights explicitly mapped across domains?

P2 – Sequence InvarianceAre non-negotiable process orders defined prior to tooling?

P3 – Rule Authority IntegrityAre business rules anatomically owned and traceable?

P4 – Component Boundary ClarityAre constraints defined independent of vendor architecture?

P5 – Implementation AnchoringAre delivery streams traceable to anatomy intent?

P6 – Operational ContinuityWill operations inherit predictable behavior?


What You Receive

Anatomy Readiness Score (0–100)Capital Exposure Heatmap

Anatomy Inflation Risk EstimateExecutive Recommendation: Fund / Refine / Halt


This is not vendor evaluation. It is capital protection through anatomy verification.



Pricing

Engagement is priced relative to:

• Program size

• Subsystem density

• Regulatory exposure

• Change volume


The 5-Day instrument typically represents a fractional capital protection investment — often below 1% of projected program value.


Pricing follows a 30-minute scoping call.



Why This Matters

Funding implementation without verifying anatomy is equivalent to building before confirming load-bearing anatomy.


Pre-Investment Capital Risk Quantification™ ensures continuity is verified before capital is deployed.


If funding approval is pending, schedule the 5-Day Scan before budget allocation becomes irreversible.

Enterprise Intelligence

Transforming Strategy into Execution with Precision and Real Intelligence

bottom of page