top of page

Enterprise Intelligence
Transforming Strategy into Execution with Precision and Real Intelligence

Oil and Energy
One Oil and Energy One Anatomy


OIL & ENERGY EA FAQs - Why do 200 IT projects ≠ Oil & Energy Enterprise Architecture?
Q: Why do 200 IT projects ≠ Oil & Energy Enterprise Architecture? Myth: Energy EA = Asset Systems + SCADA + Operations IT. Reality: Energy enterprises run on 15 departments (D1–D15) —Exploration, Production, Refining, Logistics, Trading, HSE, Field Workforce—each expressing P1–P6 differently. IT is just one department. EA(IT) ≠ Enterprise Anatomy Q: Why is project count high? Because every function runs mission-critical operations with independent rules and timelines. F


Why Oil & Energy CIOs Must Rethink IT Architecture — 10 Missing Links in the Oil & Energy IT Operating Model 💲
Oil & energy IT does not struggle because teams lack capability —it struggles because the enterprise runs without anatomy. The real cost isn’t technology. The real cost is missing anatomy.


Case USA120: How an Energy Utility Mistook Outage Maps for Enterprise Architecture Readiness
Customers could view real-time outage areas, estimated restoration times improved, and call center volumes dropped — yet the enterprise structure linking fault detection, crew dispatch, asset management, customer communications, and regulatory reporting was never modeled.


Case USA117: Why a Utility’s DER Integration Mistook Grid Visibility for Enterprise Architecture
Operations centers could see DER output instantly, adjust grid controls faster, and generate compliance reports — yet the enterprise structure linking market participation, maintenance planning, demand response, customer engagement, and regulatory coordination was never modeled.


USA31: How an Oil & Gas Major Substituted Digital Twin Pilots for Enterprise Architecture Design
In Oil & Gas, a recurring pattern is treating digital twin projects as architecture work. Asset twins for rigs, pipelines, and refineries were piloted with promising simulation results — yet the enterprise structure linking engineering, maintenance, safety, and production remained unmodeled.


USA54: Why an Energy Trading Desk Confused Data Bus Integration with Enterprise Architecture Coherence
Trade capture, pricing, and risk systems were connected for faster data flow; latency was reduced, and reporting improved — yet the enterprise structure linking trading strategy, compliance, settlements, and operations was never modeled.


Case 7: Oil & Gas Corporation - An Operational IT Transformation Mistaken for Enterprise Architecture? 💲
The Missing 70%
What they built: a robust, well-structured architecture for field IT operations and supporting systems
What they missed: the anatomical link between decisions, functions, investments, and execution across the full enterprise


From Fragmentation to Flow: One Oil Enterprise, One Anatomy 💲
By treating upstream, midstream, and downstream as separate units, companies struggle with inconsistent decision-making & inefficiencies
bottom of page
