Case SPA O20: Lost Your Chief Architect? How Software Platform Anatomy Preserves Architectural Continuity
- Krish Ayyar

- Apr 8, 2025
- 4 min read
Updated: Oct 11, 2025
Category: Organizational & People-Driven Change, Team churn, leadership shifts, missing documentation, reactive delivery.
Series: Rethinking Requirements: How the ICMG Enterprise Anatomy Model Makes Systems Change-Ready
Perspectives Covered: Strategy, Business Process, System, Component Specification, Implementation, Operations
Key Variables Impacted: Rule, Data, Event, UI, Function, Network
1. A Crisis No One Saw Coming
The Chief Architect has just left. All that’s left behind are a few outdated implementation diagrams, a deployment blueprint from six sprints ago, and a trail of emails marked “urgent”.
The diagrams are
static,
tangled in configuration and infrastructure details—
built from personal experience rather than business logic.
They don’t explain the why, just the how.
No strategic intent,
no system definitions,
and definitely no link between business objectives and code.
The architectural picture is not just incomplete—it’s invisible.
Now the incoming Chief Architect has to decode the past, deliver on future releases, and keep customer commitments alive. All without a working model of the platform’s anatomy.
So what really happens when the Chief Architect walks out—and takes the architecture with them?
2. The Chaos Unfolds: Realizing the Gap
Want to read more?
Subscribe to architecturerating.com to keep reading this exclusive post.




