The GCC executed 200+ projects across 15 banking functions. But the bank was never structurally modeled. So what looks like progress is really just activity. When transformation is measured by project completion,but no one can say what the enterprise now looks like,you don’t have architecture. You have output. Until a structural model is adopted, the GCC will remain a delivery factory—
Without Anatomy, IT spend is a moving truck with no map. Projects move — but no one’s sure where they’re headed. With Anatomy, every investment has a context. Every system has a role. And every change has traceability.
This isn’t Enterprise Architecture for a Bank.
This is an IT roadmap, wearing a borrowed title.
If 12 of the 15 critical banking functions were never touched, it’s not EA. It’s IT transformation mislabelled as Enterprise Architecture
